Updated: Jul 14, 2021
We homo sapiens, as a species have evolved a lot throughout these years of our existence. From being at the near bottom of the food chain pyramid once upon a time to us dominating this planet in every aspect, we have achieved a lot. All these achievements are the results of evolution and many revolutions we have come across so far. But what did drive humans towards these series of upgrades? Definitely the atmosphere, food chain hierarchy, threat from other animals in the jungle, and the social hierarchy after the formation of human societies. But behind all of these, It's the basic desire of humans to be better followed by working hard towards it. What separates us from other species on earth is our ability to cooperate and of course to dream big.
Work hard, dream big, never give up:
At an individual level too, every one of us has some dreams. Be it totally based on materialistic goals, goals we set as a result of being influenced by society and surroundings, or goals that are highly motivated towards uplifting society, upgrading human lives, and solving real-world problems. But despite all these big dreams, hard work, and motivation, why do most of the millennials end up failing? This is the question we must ask ourselves.
All big dreams demand taking big risks. Are you ready to resign from the job right now? Are you ready to drop out from your college to chase your dreams? These questions may seem cliche but choosing an affirmative answer even though the reality may turn out to be negative later says a lot about your psychological state of taking a big risk. But is taking a big risk enough to get success? Definitely not.
Click here to enter into the mentorship forum: Drop your doubts/problems here & get solutions from the community.
Our social structure does not endorse taking big risks. One term we can introduce here. It's called ‘the fence paradox’ which is a result of a phenomenon called risk homeostasis. I recently got to know about this through an Indian podcast.
The philosophy of risk homeostasis goes like this:
“Whenever a novel safety technology enables a person to choose between performing a task more effectively at the same perceived risk level as before or performing the task more safely at the same effectiveness level as before, he will choose the former”.
What is the fence paradox?
Let's say there is a cliff and the other side has something valuable. There is a probability that the risk-taker may fall. It's part of the game. Reality works this way. He may get up after the fall but the authority doesn't want him to fall. They create fences, build regulations.
But fences make people underestimate the risk. Their perceptions of risk get modified.
Then the fence breaks, many fall down. This time, not just one. They felt safe with the fence, they were wrong.
Reference: Pasquale Cirillo @DrCirillo on twitter.